CHAIRES

v.

TEXAS

Citator

Cited By

• United States v. Hogan, 986 F.2d 1364 (11th Cir. 1993)
  …f the proceedings against him." Dusky v. United States, 362 U.S. 402, 402, 80 S.Ct. 788, 789, 4 L.Ed.2d 824 (1960); accord, e.g., Tiller v. Esposito, 911 F. 2d 575, 576 (11th Cir.1990); Rivers v. Turner, 874 F. 2d 771, 774 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 940, 110 S.Ct. 339, 107 L.Ed.2d 328 (1989). There is no significant difference between the relative fact-versus-law content of the standard for competency to stand trial and that of the standard for competency to waive post-conviction federal review.…
• United States v. Miller, 959 F.2d 1535 (11th Cir. 1992)
  …ces, we conclude that the district court did not abuse its discretion in concluding that the two offenses were sufficiently similar to mark them as the handiwork of the accused. See United States v. Stubbins, 877 F. 2d 42 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 940, 110 S.Ct. 340, 107 L.Ed.2d 328 (1989); United States v. Messersmith, 692 F. 2d 1315 (11th Cir.1982). Having concluded that the district court did not abuse its discretion in applying Beechum’s first prong — i.e., that the extrinsic offense was rel…
• United States v. Jones, 28 F.3d 1574 (11th Cir. 1994)
  …ly stringent” when evidence of extrinsic crimes is offered to show identity by showing that because the defendant committed one crime, it was the defendant who committed another. United States v. Stubbins, 877 F. 2d 42, 44 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 940, 110 S.Ct. 340, 107 L.Ed.2d 328 (1989). “[T]he likeness of the offenses is the crucial consideration. The physical similarity must be such that it marks the offenses as the handiwork of the accused. In other words, the evidence must demonstrate a mo…