ARIZONA
v.
CALIFORNIA ET AL.
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
Arizona and California disputed boundary claims affecting three Indian reservations along the Colorado River, and the Supreme Court appointed a Special Master to reopen the existing decree and conduct proceedings to resolve the contested boundaries, with authority to gather evidence and issue reports on his findings.
© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
It is ordered that Robert B. McKay, Esq., of New York, N. Y., Professor Emeritus, New York University School of Law, be appointed Special Master in this case to reopen decree to determine disputed boundary claims with respect to the Fort Mojave, Colorado River, and Fort Yuma Indian Reservations. He shall have the authority to fix the time and conditions for the filing of additional pleadings and to direct subsequent proceedings, and the authority to summon witnesses, issue subpoenas, and take such evidence as may be introduced and such as he may deem it necessary to call for. The Special Master is directed to submit such reports as he may deem appropriate.
The compensation of the Special Master, the allowances to him, the compensation paid to his legal, technical, stenographic, and clerical assistants, the cost of printing his report, and all other proper expenses, including travel expenses, shall be charged against and be borne by the parties in such proportion as the Court may hereafter direct.
Justice Marshall took no part in the consideration or decision of this order. [For earlier order herein, see, e. g., ante, p. 886.]
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Arizona v. California, 2006 U.S. LEXIS 2703 (U.S. 1963)…ermine the disputed boundary claims with respect to the Fort Mojave, Colorado River, and Fort Yuma Indian Reservations. 493 U. S. 886. The case was referred to Robert B. McKay, Esquire, and upon his death to Frank McGarr, Esquire, as Special Master. 493 U. S. 971 (1989); 498 U. S. 964 (1990). On October 4, 1999, the Court received and ordered filed the report of Special Master McGarr. 528 U. S. 803. On June 19, 2000, the Court filed an opinion rendering a decision on the several [*152] exceptions to the repo…