HUBERT OWENS, ALIAS BUDDY OWENS, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Fla. 4th DCA | 1969-06-24
No. 2125
WALDEN, C. J., and REED and Mc-CAIN, JJ., concur.
224 So. 2d 363 Florida District Court of Appeal, Fourth District (1969) Positive Treatment
Cited by 3 cases

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

The issue raised by this appeal is grounded on the admissibility of relevant testimony as to collateral crimes committed by the appellant. Our view of the proceeding in the trial court substantiates the relevancy of the testimony of other crimes, which showed a pattern of criminality. Williams v. State, Fla.1959, 110 So.2d 654; Hawkins v. State, Fla.1968, 206 So.2d 5.

Affirmed.

WALDEN, C. J., and REED and Mc-CAIN, JJ., concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Jenkins v. State, 267 So. 2d 886 (Fla. 2d DCA 1972)
    …this Court in his direct appeal, reported in 237 So. 2d 842. The motion to vacate and set aside the judgment and sentence was properly denied when the matters raised were or could have been raised on direct appeal, Culberson v. State, Fla.App.1969, 224 So. 2d 363; Peterson v. State, Fla. App.1970, 237 So. 2d 223; Roberts v. State, Fla.App.1970, 242 So. 2d 191. Jenkins next contended in his motion to vacate that breaking and entering with intent to commit a misdemeanor is a misdemeanor and not a felony, and…
  • State v. Biesendorfer, 244 So. 2d 147 (Fla. 4th DCA 1971)
    …pon the trial court. The correctness vel non of a ruling made on an issue actually decided on appeal cannot be the subject of further review under motions filed pursuant to CrPR 1.850. Such issues are res judicata. Culberson v. State (Fla.App.1969), 224 So. 2d 363; Whitney v. State (Fla.App.1966), 184 So. 2d 207; Mitchell v. State (Fla.App.1967), 203 So. 2d 676; certiorari denied, 392 U.S. 913, 88 S.Ct. 2073, 20 L.Ed.2d 1371. The other issues raised by appellant have not been overlooked, but in view of the f…
  • Falagan v. State, 267 So. 2d 109 (Fla. 2d DCA 1972)
    …reclosed to Falagan through a post-conviction proceeding because it is a matter which was or could have been raised on direct appeal, after being first duly presented to the trial Court and obtaining ruling thereon. Culberson v. State, Fla.App.1969, 224 So. 2d 363; Roberts v. State, Fla.App.1970, 242 So. 2d 191; Peterson v. State, Fla.App.1970, 237 So. 2d 223. The order appealed denying the motion to vacate the judgment and sentence is therefore— Affirmed. LILES and MANN, JJ., concur.…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw