ERNST & WHINNEY
v.
BRADFORD-WHITE CORP.

U.S. | 1989-12-04
No. 89-604
493 U.S. 993 Supreme Court of the United States (1989) Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case
Opinion

Full opinion text not available for this case.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Cited By

  • Elliot Fineman v. Armstrong World Indus., Inc., 980 F.2d 171 (3d Cir. 1992)
    …nt notwithstanding the verdict is to afford the opposing party an opportunity to cure defects in its proofs prior to submission of the case to the jury); see also Bradford-White Corp. v. Ernst & Whinney, 872 F. 2d 1153, 1161 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 993, 110 S.Ct. 542, 107 L.Ed.2d 539 (1989). TINS does not suggest that Armstrong failed to request a directed verdict timely; indeed the record reflects that Armstrong orally moved for a directed verdict at both the close of the plaintiffs’ case and at…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw