WATSON

v.

JENNINGS ET AL.

Citator

Cited By

• United States v. Baptista-Rodriguez, 17 F.3d 1354 (11th Cir. 1994)
  …United States v. Lopez-Lima, 738 F.Supp. 1404, 1413 (S.D.Fla.1990); see also United States v. Anderson, 872 F. 2d 1508, 1517 (11th Cir.) (noting that defendants’ claims of innocent intent were adequately put before jury in CIPA case), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 1004, 110 S.Ct. 566, 107 L.Ed.2d 560 (1989). To bolster his defense, Diaz sought to testify as to the details and nature of his work as a civilian operative for the FBI between June 1980 and November 1983. This evidence, he believed, would have made mo…
• United States v. Barker Steel Co., Inc., 985 F.2d 1123 (1st Cir. 1993)
  …purpose of a government program through deceit and trickery is prohibited by § 371. Hammerschmidt v. United States, 265 U.S. 182, 188, 44 S.Ct. 511, 512, 68 L.Ed. 968 (1924); United States v. Bucey, 876 F. 2d 1297, 1312-13 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 1004, 110 S.Ct. 565, 107 L.Ed.2d 560 (1989). As noted earlier, § 371 proscribes two distinct types of conspiracies: (1) conspiracies to commit a specific offense against the United States, included elsewhere in the criminal code, and (2) conspiracies to…