MAY

v.

PRO-GUARD, INC.

Citator

Cited By (12 total)

• United States v. Stone, 948 F.2d 700 (11th Cir. 1991)
  …We now reconsider the issue on this appeal in light of Hu-ghey. II. DISCUSSION We review the legality of a criminal sentence, including an order of restitution, de novo. United States v. Barany, 884 F. 2d 1255, 1259 (9th Cir.1989), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 1034, 110 S.Ct. 755, 107 L.Ed.2d 771 (1990). At the time of the offense to which Stone pleaded guilty, August, 1985, restitution orders were authorized by the Federal Probation Act, 18 U.S.C. § 3651 (FPA) and the Victim and Witness Protection Act, 18 U.…
• United States v. Fuentes, 107 F.3d 1515 (11th Cir. 1997)
  …Barany, 884 F. 2d 1255, 1260 (9th Cir.1989) (approving delegation under Probation Act of determination of payment schedule for restitution to probation office where court has set "maximum amount of restitution in light of that loss"), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 1034, 110 S.Ct. 755, 107 L.Ed.2d 771 (1990). Notwithstanding the plain language of the statute and the persuasive opinions from our sister circuits, our precedent clearly authorizes delegation of payment schedules to the probation office. See United St…
• United States v. Snider, 957 F.2d 703 (9th Cir. 1992)
  …eal, in which he challenges only the restitution component of his sentence. II We review the legality of a criminal sentence, including its restitution component, de novo. United States v. Barany, 884 F. 2d 1255, 1259 (9th Cir.1989), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 1034, 110 S.Ct. 755, 107 L.Ed.2d 771 (1990). If the sentence complies with statutory requirements and limits, then we review it for an abuse of discretion. Id. The district court’s order of restitution in the immediate case does not specify [*706] wheth…