ALSTON

v.

LEEKE, COMMISSIONER, SOUTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, ET AL.

Citator

Cited By

• United States v. Collins, 972 F.2d 1385 (5th Cir. 1992)
  …entrapment instruction, that Ross was denying culpability. See United States v. Fotovich, 885 F. 2d 241, 242 (5th Cir.1989) (sufficiency of jury charge is determined by looking at the entire jury charge in the total context of trial), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 1034, 110 S.Ct. 754, 107 L.Ed.2d 770 (1990). XII. The defendants challenge the computation of their sentence. The guidelines establish a base offense level of 10 for “[ojffering, [gjiving, [soliciting, or [receiving a [b]ribe,” U.S.S.G. § 2Cl.l(a), and…
• Nat'l Org. FOR Women, Inc. v. Scheidler, 968 F.2d 612 (7th Cir. 1992)
  …or’ his racketeering activities. United States v. Horak, 833 F. 2d 1235, 1243 (7th Cir.1987). See also United States v. Ofchinick, 883 F. 2d 1172, 1183 (3d Cir.1989) (applying Horak’s ‘but for’ test), cert. denied sub nom., DeLucia v. United States, 493 U.S. 1034, 110 S.Ct. 753, 107 L.Ed.2d 769 (1990); United States v. Porcelli, 865 F. 2d 1352, 1365 (2d Cir.1989) (same), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 810, 110 S.Ct. 53, 107 L.Ed.2d 22 (1989). Following this reasoning, under § 1962(a), “income derived, directly or i…