KANSAS ET AL.

v.

KANSAS POWER & LIGHT CO. ET AL.

Citator

Cited By

• Idaho v. Wright, 497 U.S. 805 (U.S. 1990)
  …eyond a reasonable doubt, that the jury would have reached the same result had the error not occurred, the court reversed respondent’s conviction on the count involving the younger daughter and remanded for a new trial. Ibid. We granted certiorari, 493 U. S. 1041 (1990), and now affirm. II The Confrontation Clause of the Sixth Amendment, made applicable to the States through the Fourteenth Amendment, provides: “In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right ... to be confronted with the wi…
• Maislin Indus. v. Primary Steel, Inc., 497 U.S. 116 (U.S. 1990)
  …led rate doctrine would constitute an unreasonable practice.” Ibid, (citation omitted). Because the Courts of Appeals have disagreed on the important issue whether the ICC’s Negotiated Rates policy is consistent with the Act,8 we granted certiorari. 493 U. S. 1041 (1990). [*126] II The Act requires a motor common carrier to publish its rates in a tariff filed with the Commission. 49 U. S. C. § 10762 (1982 ed.). This Court has long understood that the filed rate governs the legal relationship between shipper…
• Kansas v. Utilicorp United Inc., 497 U.S. 199 (U.S. 1990)
  …See In re Wyoming Tight Sands Antitrust Cases, 866 F. 2d 1286, 1294 (CA10 1989). We granted certiorari to resolve a conflict between this decision and Illinois ex rel. Hartigan v. Panhandle Eastern Pipe Line Co., 852 F. 2d 891 (CA7 1988) (en banc). 493 U. S. 1041 (1990). We now affirm. II Section 4 of the Clayton Act provides in full: “[A]ny person who shall be injured in his business or property by reason of anything forbidden in the antitrust laws may sue therefor in any district court of the United Sta…