ANDREGG

v.

MERRILL LYNCH, PIERCE, FENNER & SMITH, INC., ET AL.

Citator

Cited By

• United States v. Beddow, 957 F.2d 1330 (6th Cir. 1992)
  …324 (6th Cir.1989) (not every statement highlighting the fact that the defense produce no contrary evidence is improper; a prosecutor must be able to summarize the evidence and comment on its quantitative and qualitative significance), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 1049, 110 S.Ct. 852, 107 L.Ed.2d 846 (1990). [*1337] Moreover, considered in light of the context of the arguments and the entire trial, any prejudice to the defendant was minimal and does not warrant reversal. V Finally, Beddow raises several challeng…
• United States v. Onofre R. Gallegos, 975 F.2d 710 (10th Cir. 1992)
  …Defendant could have explored a challenge for cause. On proper objection, our review of a district court’s questioning concerning juror qualifications is deferential. See United States v. Berryhill, 880 F. 2d 275, 278 (10th Cir.1989), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 1049, 110 S.Ct. 853, 107 L.Ed.2d 846 (1990). Given that this point was never raised below, our review is for plain error. Fed.R.Crim.P. 52(b); United States v. Young, 470 U.S. 1, 15-16, 105 S.Ct. 1038, 1046-47, 84 L.Ed.2d 1 (1985). Keeping in mind th…
• United States v. The AETNA Cas. & Sur. Co., 988 F.2d 88 (10th Cir. 1993)
  …6). Indeed, it was cited with approval by the district court. (Appellant’s App. at 35.) Because one panel of this court is bound by the precedents of another, however old, United States v. Berryhill, 880 F. 2d 275, 277 (10th Cir.1989), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 1049, 110 S.Ct. 853, 107 L.Ed.2d 846 (1990), we conclude that Boyd controls this appeal. Under Boyd, Plaintiff’s claim to recover its repair expenses from the Miller Act bond plainly cannot stand. The repairs were not for ordinary wear and tear — they w…