JOHN DOE AGENCY ET AL.

v.

JOHN DOE CORP.

Citator

Cited By

• Walker v. Nationsbank OF Fla. N.A., 53 F.3d 1548 (11th Cir. 1995)
  …ersons could not arrive at a contrary verdict, the grant of a directed verdict is proper. Verbraeken v. Westinghouse Electric Corp., 881 F. 2d 1041, 1045 (11th Cir.1989) (quoting Boeing Co. v. Shipman, 411 F. 2d 365 (5th Cir.1969)), cert. dismissed, 493 U.S. 1064, 110 S.Ct. 884, 107 L.Ed.2d 1012 (1990). If, however, substantial evidence is presented opposed to the motion, and this evidence is of such quality and weight that reasonable and fair-minded persons in the exercise of impartial judgment might reac…
• Bateman v. Mnemonics, Inc., 79 F.3d 1532 (11th Cir. 1996)
  …ust be a conflict in substantial evidence to create a jury question.’ ” Id. (quoting Verbraeken v. Westinghouse Elec. Corp., 881 F. 2d 1041, 1045 (11th Cir.1989) (quoting Boeing Co. v. Shipman, 411 F. 2d 365, 374-75 (5th Cir.1969)), cert. dismissed, 493 U.S. 1064, 110 S.Ct. 884, 107 L.Ed.2d 1012 (1990). In the case at bar, Bateman and Fricker’s state law trade secret claim is predicated upon the existence of an implied confidential relationship. Given the backdrop of federal preemption pursuant to section…
• Jameson v. The Arrow Co., 75 F.3d 1528 (11th Cir. 1996)
  …eventy, (2) was subject to adverse employment action, (3) was replaced with a person outside the protected group, and (4) was qualified to do the job. See Verbraeken v. Westinghouse Elec. Corp., 881 F. 2d 1041, 1045 (11th Cir.1989), cert. dismissed, 493 U.S. 1064, 110 S.Ct. 884, 107 L.Ed.2d 1012 (1990). These criteria are altered slightly in both a reduction-in-force (“RIF”) case and where a position is eliminated in its entirety; in these instances, the plaintiff establishes a prima facie case by-demonstr…