STATE OF FLORIDA, PETITIONER,
v.
ROGER H. HARPER, RESPONDENT
STATE OF FLORIDA, PETITIONER,
ROGER H. HARPER, RESPONDENT
224 So. 2d 684
Florida Supreme Court (1969)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 3 cases
Opinion of the Court
The petition for writ of certiorari reflected probable jurisdiction in this Court. After argument and upon further consideration, we have determined that the writ was improvidently issued. The writ must be and is discharged and the petition is dismissed.
It is so ordered.
ERVIN, C. J., and ROBERTS, DREW, THORNAL, CARLTON, ADKINS and BOYD, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
In re Weinstein, 518 So. 2d 1370 (Fla. 4th DCA 1988)…ut intentionally failing to do so after being thoroughly cautioned may. The awesome power to punish for contempt should be cautiously and sparingly exercised. Sandstrom v. State; Harper v. State, 217 So. 2d 591 (Fla. 4th DCA 1968), cert, dismissed, 224 So. 2d 684 (Fla.1969). We recognize that the particular conduct found offensive in this case might well have passed unnoticed or gone without comment in many other courtrooms. Nevertheless, counsel who intentionally disregards an order of the trial court, even…
-
N. Shore Med. Ctr., Inc. v. Bystrom, 461 So. 2d 167 (Fla. 3d DCA 1984)…hysicians. The result may have been different under the law that existed when Southern Baptist [Hospital of Florida, Inc. v. Tax Assessor, 30 Fla.Supp. 45 (Cir.Ct. Duval Co. 1968), aff'd sub nom Philips v. Southern Baptist Hospital of Florida, Inc., 224 So. 2d 684 (Fla.1969)] was decided. However, at present, the law explicitly provides that: (2) Only those portions of property used predominantly for charitable ... purposes shall be exempt. In no event shall an incidental use of property either qualify such…
-
In re the Matter of Steven E. Goldman, 546 So. 2d 779 (Fla. 4th DCA 1989)…particular act constitutes contempt of court, the test is whether the nature and reasonable tendencies of the matter complained of directly affect the administration of justice. Harper v. State, 217 So. 2d 591 (Fla. 4th DCA 1968), cert. discharged, 224 So. 2d 684 (Fla.1969). In the instant case, Goldman’s conduct did not evince a willful disregard for the orderly administration of justice. In the future, it would behoove Goldman to more closely monitor his files so that a court is not inconvenienced, hamper…