SORRELLS BROS. PACKING CO., INC., AND HARDWARE MUTUAL CASUALTY CO., PETITIONERS,
v.
WILLIE MAE BATES AND FLORIDA INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION, RESPONDENTS
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The Florida Supreme Court denied a petition for writ of certiorari, affirming an order of the Florida Industrial Commission. The court found the commission's order was supported by competent substantial evidence and legally sound.
Yes, the Florida Supreme Court held that the order of the Judge of Industrial Claims, as affirmed by the Full Industrial Commission, was supported by competent substantial evidence and complied with the law.
“Our consideration of the record, briefs and arguments leads us to the conclusion that the order of the Judge of Industrial Claims is supported by competent substantial evidence and comports with the essential requirements of law.”
This quote establishes the court's primary finding regarding the evidence and legal basis of the lower commission's order.
Previewing 1 of 3 key quotes on this case — the court’s exact language, pinpointed for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceThe case involves a petition for writ of certiorari to review an order of the Florida Industrial Commission. The specific facts leading to the commiss…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Essential Requirements Of Law cases and more on FLexlaw
By petition for Writ of Certiorari we have for review an order of the Florida Industrial Commission dated July 23, 1968.
Our consideration of the record, briefs and arguments leads us to the conclusion that the order of the Judge of Industrial Claims is supported by competent substantial evidence and comports with the essential requirements of law. United States Casualty Co. v. Maryland Casualty Co., 55 So.2d 741 (Fla.1951). Its affirmance by the Full Industrial Commission is, therefore, without error. Certiorari is denied.
The attorneys for respondent, Willie Mae Bates, are awarded a fee in the amount of Three Hundred Fifty Dollars ($350.00) for services rendered in this Court.
It is so ordered.
ERVIN, C. J., DREW, CARLTON, ADKINS and BOYD, JJ., and RAWLS, District Court Judge, concur.
ROBERTS, J., dissents with opinion.
(dissenting) :
See Lee Engineering and Construction Company v. Fellows, Fla., 209 So.2d 454.
ROBERTS, J.
(dissenting) :
See Lee Engineering and Construction Company v. Fellows, Fla., 209 So. 2d 454.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Gibson v. Minute Maid Corp., 251 So. 2d 260 (Fla. 1971)…ted by competent substantial evidence. See Painter v. Board of Public Instruction of Dade County, 223 So. 2d 33 (Fla.1969); Williams v. Alfred S. Austin Construction Company, 224 So. 2d 280 (Fla.1969) ; Payette v. Gulf stream Air-Conditioning, Inc., 224 So. 2d 686 (Fla.1969); and Tracy v. Americana Hotel, 234 So. 2d 641 (Fla.1970). This Court pointed out in Herring v. Jackson Bearing & Supply, Inc., 212 So. 2d 768 (Fla.1968), that even though the reviewing court might have arrived at factual findings contrar…
Authorities Cited
- US Cas. Co. v. Md. Cas. Co., 55 So.2d 741 (Fla. 1951)
- Gray v. Attorney Gen., State of Fla. and/or State Attorney, Cir. Court, Volusia Cnty., Fla., 209 So. 2d 454 (Fla. 1968)