RANDALL ET AL.

v.

MICHIGAN

Citator

Cited By (11 total)

• United States v. Amos Salmon, 944 F.2d 1106 (3d Cir. 1991)
  …. B. DISCUSSION 1. Sufficiency of the Evidence “[V]iew[ing] the evidence and the inferences logically deducible therefrom in the light most favorable to the government,” United States v. McNeill, 887 F. 2d 448, 449-50 (3d Cir.1989), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 1087, 110 S.Ct. 1152, 107 L.Ed.2d 1055 (1990), we first consider whether substantial evidence, direct or circumstantial, United States v. Kapp, 781 F. 2d 1008, 1010 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1024, 106 S.Ct. 1220, 89 L.Ed.2d 330 (1986), supports t…
• Wildbur v. Arco Chem. Co., 974 F.2d 631 (5th Cir. 1992)
  …e work-product rule is designed to benefit, as [he does to his] own trustees.’ ”). By failing to address this issue in their briefs, plaintiffs have abandoned it. See, e.g., United States v. Undell, 881 F. 2d 1313, 1325 (5th Cir.1989), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 1087, 110 S.Ct. 1152, 107 L.Ed.2d 1056 (1990). We therefore decline to disturb the magistrate judge’s conclusion that discovery against Anderson was protected by the work product doctrine. VI. CONCLUSION For the foregoing reasons, we VACATE the judgmen…
• United States v. Granados, 962 F.2d 767 (8th Cir. 1992)
  …ortionate just because it exceeds a co-defendant’s sentence. See United States v. Lindell, 881 F. 2d 1313, 1324-25 (5th Cir.1989) (co-defendant’s cooperation with the government could have played a legitimate role in lesser sentences), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 1087, 110 S.Ct. 1152, 107 L.Ed.2d 1056 (1990); United States v. Wayne, 903 F. 2d 1188, 1198 (8th Cir.1990) (defendant’s greater role in the offense justified the harsher sentence). Furthermore, “[a] sentencing court is not required to enunciate the reas…