DAVIS ET UX.

v.

UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By

• United States v. Williams, 957 F.2d 1238 (5th Cir. 1992)
  …nce of guilt. (Appellee’s Br. at 12) (citing United States v. BeltranRios, 878 F. 2d 1208, 1211 (9th Cir.1989); United States v. Hernandez-Cuartas, 717 F. 2d 552, (11th Cir.1983); United States v. Quigley, 890 F. 2d 1019 (8th Cir.1989) cert. denied, 493 U.S. 1091, 110 S.Ct. 1163, 107 L.Ed.2d 1066 (1990)). The Government maintains that the drug courier profile testimony in this case was not admitted as substantive evidence of Williams’s guilt, but as background information. The record belies the government’s…

  ← 1 / 3 →
• United States v. DeShawn Lee Robinson, 978 F.2d 1554 (10th Cir. 1992)
  …on to drug trafficking.” Id. Profile evidence is a “point by point examination of profile characteristics” that enable the investigator to justify pursuing the matter. United States v. Quigley, 890 F. 2d 1019, 1022-24 (8th Cir. 1989), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 1091, 110 S.Ct. 1163, 107 L.Ed.2d 1066 (1990). As the dissent points out, because of the limited usefulness of profiles, courts have declared testimony concerning the defendant’s alignment with a particular profile incompetent as direct evidence of guilt…