SUNG MAN KIM ET UX.

v.

SOO AN LEE ET UX.

Citator

Cited By

• United States v. Calhoon, 97 F.3d 518 (11th Cir. 1996)
  …n to know that their activities were illegal). On whether the probative value was outweighed by an unfair prejudice, this court defers to the discretion of the trial court. United States v. Elkins, 885 F. 2d 775, 784 (11th Cir.1989), cert. denied, 494 U.S. 1005, 110 S.Ct. 1300, 108 L.Ed.2d 477 (1990). We will reverse the trial court’s decision to admit the testimony only if it were clearly an abuse of discretion. We find none here. The trial court instructed the jury regarding the limited purpose for wh…
• United States v. Chirinos, 112 F.3d 1089 (11th Cir. 1997)
  …that misconduct is so pronounced and persistent as to ‘permeate the entire atmosphere of the trial.’” United States v. Elkins, 885 F. 2d 775, 787 (11th Cir.1989) (quoting United States v. McLain, 823 F. 2d 1457, 1462 (11th Cir. 1987)), cert. denied, 494 U.S. 1005, 110 S.Ct. 1300, 108 L.Ed.2d 477 (1990). To establish a claim of prosecutorial misconduct, a defendant must first prove that the prosecutor made an improper remark. United States v. Obregon, 893 F. 2d 1307, 1310 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, 494 U.S.…
• United States v. Wake, 948 F.2d 1422 (5th Cir. 1991)
  …ne to authenticate a document does not constitute error_ Fed.R.Evid. 901(a) requires only some competent evidence in the record to support authentication.” United States v. Elkins, 885 F. 2d 775, 785 (11th Cir.1989) (citation omitted), cert. denied, 494 U.S. 1005, 110 S.Ct. 1300, 108 L.Ed.2d 477 (1990). Further, it was not impermissible to use the contents of the documents to establish the identity of the declarant. United States v. Luschen, 614 F. 2d 1164, 1174 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 446 U.S. 939, [*14…