PRICE
v.
VIKING PENGUIN, INC., ET AL., 493 U. S. 1036; AND LACKLAND V. J. C. PENNEY CO., 493 U. S. 1036
PRICE
VIKING PENGUIN, INC., ET AL., 493 U. S. 1036; AND LACKLAND V. J. C. PENNEY CO., 493 U. S. 1036
494 U.S. 1013
Supreme Court of the United States (1990)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 4 cases
Opinion
Full opinion text not available for this case.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Holland v. Collins, 950 F.2d 169 (5th Cir. 1991)…and “could easily be considered by the jury.” Additionally, in Bridge v. Lynaugh, 856 F. 2d 712, 715 (5th Cir.), modified on rehearing, 860 F. 2d 162 (5th Cir. 1988), modified on other grounds, 863 F. 2d 370 (5th Cir.1989), vacated on other grounds, 494 U.S. 1013, 110 S.Ct. 1313, 108 L.Ed.2d 489 (1990), the petitioner argued, in mitigation, that he had not been connected with any violent crime before the incident in question. We concluded that that evidence “clearly could properly be addressed under the Texa…
-
Bridge v. Collins, 963 F.2d 767 (5th Cir. 1992)…ificate of probable cause and instructed us to reconsider the case in the light of Selvage v. Collins, 494 U.S. 108, 110 S.Ct. 974, 108 L.Ed.2d 93 (1990), and Penry v. Lynaugh, 492 U.S. 302, 109 S.Ct. 2934, 106 L.Ed.2d 256 (1989). Bridge v. Collins, 494 U.S. 1013, 110 S.Ct. 1313, 108 L.Ed.2d 489 (1990). Addressing Bridge’s claim on the merits and in the light of Penry, we hold that his claim has no merit. Bridge argues that his death sentence was imposed in violation of the Eighth and Fourteenth Amendments b…