HEISHMAN

v.

CALIFORNIA

Citator

Cited By

• Sapp v. State, 660 So. 2d 1146 (Fla. 1st DCA 1995)
  …nt of counsel at his arraignment on the unrelated charge is to disregard the ordinary meaning of that request.’ ” McNeil, 501 U.S. at 178-79, 111 S.Ct. at 2209, quoting State v. Stewart, 113 Wash.2d 462, 471, 780 P. 2d 844, 849 (1989), cert. denied, 494 U.S. 1020, 110 S.Ct. 1327, 108 L.Ed.2d 502 (1990). The Court ruled that an invocation of the Miranda right to counsel “requires, at a minimum, some statement that can reasonably be construed to be expression of a desire for the assistance of an attorney in…
• McNEIL v. Wisconsin, 501 U.S. 171 (U.S. 1991)
  …resent charges merely by requesting [*179] the appointment of counsel at his arraignment on the unrelated charge is to disregard the ordinary meaning of that request.” State v. Stewart, 113 Wash. 2d 462, 471, 780 P. 2d 844, 849 (1989), cert. denied, 494 U. S. 1020 (1990). Our holding in Michigan v. Jackson, 475 U. S. 625 (1986), does not, as petitioner asserts, contradict the foregoing distinction; to the contrary, it rests upon it. That case, it will be recalled, held that after the Sixth Amendment right to…