WALLACE

v.

ARIZONA

Citator

Cited By

• Wilburn Dobbs v. Turpin, 142 F.3d 1383 (11th Cir. 1998)
  …Smith v. Dugger, 840 F. 2d 787, 795 (11th Cir.1988) (finding that lawyer who, after an exhaustive background search, decided not to present mitigating evidence at a sentencing hearing based on a strategic decision was not ineffective), cert. denied, 494 U.S. 1047, 110 S.Ct. 1511, 108 L.Ed.2d 647 (1990). These strategic decisions, however, “must flow from an informed decision.” Harris v. Dugger, 874 F. 2d 756, 763 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 1011, 110 S.Ct. 573, 107 L.Ed.2d 568 (1989). This circui…
• United States v. Nyhuis, 8 F.3d 731 (11th Cir. 1993)
  …thout merit. See, e.g., Smith v. Dugger, 840 F. 2d 787, 791 (11th Cir.1988) (declining to decide a procedural default issue because after considering “the merits it [was] apparent there [was] no substance to the constitutional claim”), cert. denied, 494 U.S. 1047, 110 S.Ct. 1511, 108 L.Ed.2d 647 (1990). Goodman concedes that a person convicted of aiding or abetting “is punishable as a principal.” 18 U.S.C. § 2(a); see also U.S.S.G. § 2X2.1. The commentary to § 2X2.1 explains that “[t]his section provides t…
• Roberts v. Singletary, 29 F.3d 1474 (11th Cir. 1994)
  …erits, Roberts would be entitled to no relief. . At oral argument, Roberts argued that the Florida courts do not consistently apply procedural bars. This argument is specious. See Smith v. Dugger, 840 F. 2d 787, 796 (11th Cir.1988), cert. denied, 494 U.S. 1047, 110 S.Ct. 1511, 108 L.Ed.2d 647 (1990).…

Authorities Cited

• Gregg v. Georgia, 428 U.S. 153 (U.S. 1976)