MARYLAND PEST CONTROL ASSN. ET AL.

v.

MONTGOMERY COUNTY, MARYLAND, ET AL.

Citator

Cited By (13 total)

• Henglein v. Informal Plan FOR Plant Shutdown Benefits FOR Salaried Employees, 974 F.2d 391 (3d Cir. 1992)
  …b) (second sentence), we review the district court’s findings of fact for clear error, and we exercise plenary review over the district court’s legal conclusions. See Miller v. Fairchild Indus., Inc., 885 F. 2d 498, 503 (9th Cir.1989), cert. denied, 494 U.S. 1056, 110 S.Ct. 1524, 108 L.Ed.2d 764 (1900); EEOC v. Metal Svc. Co., 892 F. 2d 341, 346 n. 5 (3d Cir.1990). We have jurisdiction of this appeal from a final decision of the district court. See 28 U.S.C. § 1291. III. At the outset of our discussion, we…
• In re Jogert, Inc. v. Jogert, Inc., 950 F.2d 1498 (9th Cir. 1991)
  …) misrepresented a material fact, (2) suppressed facts it knew or believed to be true, or (3) made a promise intending not to perform it. Miller v. Fairchild Indus., 876 F. 2d 718, 728 (9th Cir.), amended 885 F. 2d 498 (9th Cir.1989), cert. denied, 494 U.S. 1056, 110 S.Ct. 1524, 108 L.Ed.2d 764 (1990). Stated differently, “a fraud action requires (1) misrepresentation; (2) knowledge of the falsity of the representation; (3) intent to induce reliance; (4) justifiable reliance; and (5) damages.” Stewart v. Ra…
• Market/Media Research, Inc. v. Union-Tribune Publ'g Co. & Copley Press, Inc., 951 F.2d 102 (6th Cir. 1991)
  …ts “purposefully availed” themselves of “the privilege of acting in the forum state or causing consequence in the forum state.” [*105] Theunissen, 935 F. 2d at 1460; LAK, Inc. v. Deer Creek Enters., 885 F. 2d 1293, 1299 (6th Cir.1989), cert. denied, 494 U.S. 1056, 110 S.Ct. 1525, 108 L.Ed.2d 764 (1990); American Greetings, 839 F. 2d at 1169; Southern Machine Co. v. Mohasco Indus., 401 F. 2d 374, 381-82 (6th Cir.1968). MMR contends that when the district court determined the issue of purposeful availment by…