KITTS, AS PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVE OF THE ESTATE OF KITTS

v.

GENERAL MOTORS CORP.

Citator

Cited By

• Hyundai Motor Co. (Korea) v. Phillip, 639 So. 2d 1064 (Fla. 3d DCA 1994)
  …disagree. [*1066] Based on the authority of Myrick v. Freuhauf Corp., 13 F. 3d 1516 (11th Cir.1994); Perry v. Mercedes Benz of N. Am., Inc., 957 F. 2d 1257 (5th Cir.1992); Taylor v. General Motors Corp., 875 F. 2d 816 (11th Cir.1989), cert. denied, 494 U.S. 1065, 110 S.Ct. 1781, 108 L.Ed.2d 783 (1990); Wood v. General Motors Corp., 865 F. 2d 395 (1st Cir.1988), cert. denied, 494 U.S. 1065, 110 S.Ct. 1781, 108 L.Ed.2d 782 (1990), we find that the National Traffic and Motor Vehicle Safety Act does not preempt…

  ← 1 / 2 →
• Pac. Mut. Life Ins. Co. v. Haslip, 499 U.S. 1 (U.S. 1991)
• Freightliner Corp. v. Myrick, 514 U.S. 280 (U.S. 1995)
  …The Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit consolidated the cases and reversed. Myrick v. Freuhauf Corp., 13 F. 3d 1516 (1994). It held that under its previous decision in Taylor v. General Motors Corp., 875 F. 2d 816 (CA11 1989), cert. denied, 494 U. S. 1065 (1990), the state-law tort claims were not expressly pre-empted. The Court of Appeals rejected petitioners’ alternative argument that the claims were pre-empted due to a conflict between state law and the federal regulatory scheme. We granted certio…