CANDEE CONSTRUCTION CO., INC.

v.

MYERS ET AL.

Citator

Cited By

• United States v. Jones, 143 F.3d 1417 (11th Cir. 1998)
  …the plea colloquy did not violate the defendant’s substantial rights and any technical errors are harmless. See United States v. McCarty, 99 F. 3d 383, 386 (11th Cir.1996); United States v. Carey, 884 F. 2d 547, 548-49 (11th Cir.1989), cert. denied, 494 U.S. 1067, 110 S.Ct. 1786, 108 L.Ed.2d 787 (1990). In this case, the defendant pled guilty after negotiating with the government and signing a written plea agreement. The written plea agreement states that “the defendant fully understands that his plea of g…
• Christopher v. Mobil OIL Corp., 950 F.2d 1209 (5th Cir. 1992)
  …sequent hirings that the “pattern of age discrimination” became evidence was held insufficient to support equitable estoppel. Pruet Production Co., 784 F. 2d at 1279-80; accord Chapman v. Homco, Inc., 886 F. 2d 756, 758 (5th Cir.1989), cert. denied, 494 U.S. 1067, 110 S.Ct. 1784, 108 L.Ed.2d 785 (1990); Blumberg, [*1217] 848 F. 2d at 645.2 The showing required for a prima fade employment discrimination claim is minimal, see Pruet Production Co., 784 F. 2d at 1279, and when “facts that would support a cause o…
• United States v. Gyan Parkash Syal, 963 F.2d 900 (6th Cir. 1992)
  …ven worst case prospect of additional time in prison resulting from revocation of supervised - release resulted in significantly less time in prison than maximum sentence allowed); United States v. Carey, 884 F. 2d 547 (11th Cir.1989), cert. denied, 494 U.S. 1067, 110 S.Ct. 1786, 108 L.Ed.2d 787 (1990) (failure to notify defendant, in Rule 11 colloquy, of supervised release constituted harmless error where supervised release was in pre-sentence report which was reviewed by defendant). United States v. Barr…