RODRIGUEZ

v.

UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By

• United States v. Butler, 102 F.3d 1191 (11th Cir. 1997)
  …here a contemporaneous limiting instruction has been given to the jury, the court retains discretion to determine whether the instruction needs repeating at the end of trial. United States v. Ashby, 864 F. 2d 690, 694 (10th Cir.1988), cert. denied, 494 U.S. 1070, 110 S.Ct. 1793, 108 L.Ed.2d 794 (1990). In the instant case, the court gave a limiting instruction when it excluded the evidence. It quite properly might have believed that repeating the instruction would unduly emphasize the 1988 search in the a…
• United States v. Camilo Ayala-Rivera, 954 F.2d 1275 (7th Cir. 1992)
  …Brunson, 915 F. 2d 942 (5th Cir.1990), but with more traditional issues of interpretation and record evaluation. See United States v. White, 903 F. 2d 457, 466-67 (7th Cir.1990); United States v. Garcia, 893 F. 2d 250 (10th Cir.1989), cert. denied, 494 U.S. 1070, 110 S.Ct. 1792, 108 L.Ed.2d 793 (1990); see also United States v. Rodriguez, 943 F. 2d 215, 217 (2d Cir.1991); United States v. Delgado, 936 F. 2d 303, 308-09 (7th Cir.1991), petition for cert. filed, 60 U.S.L.W. 3453 (U.S. Dec. 5, 1991) (No. 91-93…
• Canale v. United States, 969 F.2d 13 (2d Cir. 1992)
  …Dieter, 429 U.S. 6, 8, 97 S.Ct. 18, 19, 50 L.Ed.2d 8 (1976) (per curiam); United States v. Healy, 376 U.S. 75, 77-78, 84 S.Ct. 553, 554-555, 11 L.Ed.2d 527 (1964); see also United States v. Rodriguez, 892 F. 2d 233, 235 (2d Cir.1989), cert. denied, 494 U.S. 1070, 110 S.Ct. 1791, 108 L.Ed.2d 792 (1990) (“Once the district court denies the motion [for reconsideration], the clock is reset to zero, and the full time for appeal ‘begins to run anew from the date of the entry of the order disposing of the motion.’…