SANDERS

v.

SOUTH CENTRAL BELL TELEPHONE CO.

Citator

Cited By

• Clough v. Dominica Rush, 959 F.2d 182 (10th Cir. 1992)
  …equirement must be applied mechanically in order to protect a party’s right of appeal”); Reid v. White Motor Corp., 886 F. 2d 1462, 1465-68 (6th Cir.1989) (holding appellant could not waive Rule 58 requirements to defeat jurisdiction), cert. denied, 494 U.S. 1080, 110 S.Ct. 1809, 108 L.Ed.2d 939 (1990); see also United States v. Indrelunas, 411 U.S. 216, 219, 93 S.Ct. 1562, 1563, 36 L.Ed.2d 202 (1973) (“Rule 58 was substantially amended ... to remove uncertainties as to when a judgment is entered_”). Our ho…
• Benny M. Estes & Assocs., Inc. v. Time Ins. Co., 980 F.2d 1228 (8th Cir. 1992)
  …t be liable if he acts, without bad faith, to protect the public interest or a third person to whom he stands in a relation of responsibility.” Conway Corp. v. Construction Engineers, Inc., 300 Ark. 225, 233, 782 S.W. 2d 36, 40 (1989), cert. denied, 494 U.S. 1080, 110 S.Ct. 1809, 108 L.Ed.2d 939 (1990). It is possible, however, for a party to negotiate away or waive this "privilege.” In this case, we hold that there was sufficient evidence for the jury to find that Time, through the oral assurances given by…