NEISTEIN

v.

ILLINOIS ATTORNEY REGISTRATION AND DISCIPLINARY COMMISSION

Citator

Cited By

• Bhupendra Chudasama v. Mazda Motor Corp., 123 F.3d 1353 (11th Cir. 1997)
  …U.S. 224, 241-45, 108 S.Ct. 978, 988-90, 99 L.Ed.2d 194 (1988) (discussing rationale behind fraud on the market theory); Ross v. Bank South, N.A., 885 F. 2d 723, 739 (11th Cir.1989) (en banc) (Tjoflat, J., specially concurring) (same), cert. denied, 495 U.S. 905, 110 S.Ct. 1924, 109 L.Ed.2d 287 (1990). We find it very doubtful that Georgia courts would change their historic requirement of proof of reliance by grafting a rule of federal securities law onto their body of tort law. The point of this discussio…
• Twiss v. Kury, 25 F.3d 1551 (11th Cir. 1994)
  …st show: (1) a misstatement or omission; (2) of a material fact; (3) made with scienter; (4) on which such party relied; and (5) that caused that party’s injury. Ross v. Bank South, N.A., 885 F. 2d 723, 728 (11th Cir.1989) (era banc), cert. denied, 495 U.S. 905, 110 S.Ct. 1924, 109 L.Ed.2d 287 (1990); Gochnauer v. A.G. Edwards & Sons, Inc., 810 F. 2d 1042, 1046 (11th Cir.1987).…
• First Interstate Bank OF Denver, N.A. v. Pring, 969 F.2d 891 (10th Cir. 1992)
  …re trustee could be liable if plaintiffs had evidence, as opposed to just conclusory allegations, that the trustee had knowledge of the fraud), vacated, 848 F. 2d 1132 (11th Cir.1988), on reh’g, 885 F. 2d 723 (11th Cir.1989) (en banc), cert. denied, 495 U.S. 905, 110 S.Ct. 1924, 109 L.Ed.2d 287 (1990). Thus, Central Bank is not immune from liability if plaintiffs can prove the elements of aider-and-abettor liability. The established rule is that recklessness is sufficient scienter for a primary violation…