DIXON

v.

UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By

• United States v. Deutsch, 987 F.2d 878 (2d Cir. 1993)
  …orney.”); Phillips v. Brennan, 912 F. 2d 189, 191 n. 2 (7th Cir.1990) (same), cert. denied, — U.S.-, 113 S.Ct. 990, 122 L.Ed.2d 142 (1993); United States v. Bradley, 896 F. 2d 284, 286 (7th Cir.) (“P.T. Barnum would have been proud.”), cert. denied, 495 U.S. 909, 110 S.Ct. 1935, 109 L.Ed.2d 298 (1990); United States v. Bradley, 892 F. 2d 634, 634-35 (7th Cir.1990) (“Deutsch is a con man, a fraud, a phony, a humbug, a mountebank—in short, an impostor [sic].”); United States v. Ziegenhagen, 890 F. 2d 937, 939…
• United States v. Barksdale-Contreras, 972 F.2d 111 (5th Cir. 1992)
  …held [*114] “that an indictment need not precisely track the language of the statute; it is sufficient if it informs the defendant of every element of the offense charged.” United States v. Hernandez, 891 F. 2d 521, 524 (5th Cir.1989), cert. denied, 495 U.S. 909, 110 S.Ct. 1935, 109 L.Ed.2d 298 (1990), (citing United States v. Boyd, 885 F. 2d 246 (5th Cir.1989)). We find the indictment sufficient. Appellants challenge the sufficiency of evidence as well as the admission of certain testimony. Deference to t…
• United States v. Fortney, 957 F.2d 629 (8th Cir. 1992)
  …a district court “is not required to inform the defendant of the applicable guideline range or the actual sentence he will receive” prior to accepting a guilty plea. United States v. Thomas, 894 F. 2d 996, 997 (8th Cir.) (per curiam), cert. denied, 495 U.S. 909, 110 S.Ct. 1935, 109 L.Ed.2d 298 (1990). Fortney does not argue that the district court failed to comply with Rule 11 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure. He also does not contest the validity of his seven prior convictions. He concedes that…