BLUE CROSS OF CALIFORNIA

v.

HUGHES

Citator

Cited By

• United States v. Walser, 3 F.3d 380 (11th Cir. 1993)
  …fan- and impartial verdict. See United States v. Silien, 825 F. 2d 320, 323 (11th Cir.1987). If so, “though the task be difficult,” there is no compelling prejudice. United States v. Fernandez, 892 F. 2d 976, 990 (11th Cir.1989), cert. dismissed, 495 U.S. 944, 110 S.Ct. 2201, 109 L.Ed.2d 527 (1990). Moreover, if the possible prejudice may be cured by a cautionary instruction severance is not required. Jacoby, 955 F. 2d at 1542. We have examined the trial transcript closely to determine whether the eve…
• United States v. Holloway, 971 F.2d 675 (11th Cir. 1992)
  …it ‘had substantial and injurious effect or influence in determining the jury’s verdict.’ ” Id. at 449, 106 S.Ct. at 732 (emphasis added) (citation omitted); see also United States v. Fernandez, 892 F. 2d 976, 985 n. 8 (11th Cir.), cert. dismissed, 495 U.S. 944, 110 S.Ct. 2201, 109 L.Ed.2d 527 (1989). We see no indication in the record that the joinder influenced the jury verdict nor did Rudder avert to any such prejudice. Rudder only argued that mis-joinder was prejudicial per se. We therefore find no…
• United States v. Rosnow, 977 F.2d 399 (8th Cir. 1992)
  …” is incomplete, and two [or more] conspiracies rather than one are charged. United States v. Levine, 546 F. 2d 658, 663 (5th Cir.1977)13 (citations omitted); see also United States v. Fernandez, 892 F. 2d 976, 986 (11th Cir.1989), cert. dismissed, 495 U.S. 944, 110 S.Ct. 2201, 109 L.Ed.2d 527 (1990); United States v. Castro, 829 F. 2d 1038, 1045 (11th Cir.1987). Put another way, a “common purpose of a single enterprise must motivate each participant and each act” and “mere knowledge of another [*406] simi…