DAVID BLANK, SHELDON W. BLANK, ARTHUR BLANK AND SOUTHERN BEVERAGES, INC., A FLORIDA CORPORATION, APPELLANTS,
v.
YOO HOO OF FLORIDA CORP., APPELLEE

Fla. 3d DCA | 1969-07-28
No. 67-1078
Before CHARLES CARROLL, BARK-DULL and SWANN, JJ.
225 So. 2d 438 Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (1969)

AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.

Synopsis

This case involves a prior summary judgment that was affirmed by the Florida District Court of Appeal, but later quashed by the Florida Supreme Court. The District Court of Appeal, following the Supreme Court's mandate, vacated its prior judgment, reversed the summary judgment, and remanded the case for further proceedings.


Holding

The Florida District Court of Appeal held that its prior judgment affirming the summary judgment was vacated, and the summary judgment itself was reversed, in accordance with the mandate from the Florida Supreme Court.


Key Quotes

“WHEREAS, the judgment of this court was entered on August 20, 1968 (213 So. 2d 464) affirming the summary judgment of [*439] the Circuit Court of Dade County, Florida in the above styled cause; and WHEREAS, on review of this court's judgment by certiorari, the Supreme Court of Florida by its opinion and judgment dated May 7, 1969 (222 So. 2d 420) and mandate now lodged in this court, quashed this court's judgment of affirmance with directions for further proceedings;”

This quote establishes the procedural history, including the initial affirmance by the District Court and the subsequent quashing by the Supreme Court.

Previewing 1 of 2 key quotes on this case — the court’s exact language, pinpointed for members.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Facts & Procedural History

The appellants, David Blank and others, appealed a summary judgment entered against them by the Circuit Court of Dade County. The Florida District Cou…

The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.


Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

ORDER ON MANDATE

PER CURIAM.

WHEREAS, the judgment of this court was entered on August 20, 1968 (213 So.2d 464) affirming the summary judgment of *439the Circuit Court of Dade County, Florida in the above styled cause; and

WHEREAS, on review of this court’s judgment by certiorari, the Supreme Court of Florida by its opinion and judgment dated May 7, 1969 (222 So.2d 420) and mandate now lodged in this court, quashed this court’s judgment of affirmance with directions for further proceedings;

NOW, THEREFORE, It is Ordered that the mandate of this court heretofore issued in this cause on September 6, 1968 is withdrawn, the opinion and judgment of this court dated August 20, 1968 is vacated, the said opinion and judgment of the Supreme Court of Florida is herewith made the opinion and judgment of this court, the summary judgment of the circuit court appealed from is reversed and the cause remanded for further proceedings not inconsistent with the said opinion and judgment of the Supreme Court of Florida. Costs allowed shall be taxed in the trial court (Rule 3.16 (b) Florida Appellate Rules, 32 F.S.A.).


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw