CARL JOHNSON, APPELLANT,
v.
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Fla. 1st DCA | 1969-08-12
No. J-487
JOHNSON, C. J., and CARROLL, DONALD K., and RAWLS, JJ., concur.
225 So. 2d 440 Florida District Court of Appeal, First District (1969) Positive Treatment
Cited by 6 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CÜRIAM.

PER CÜRIAM.

This cause having been orally argued before the Court, the briefs and record on appeal having been read and given full consideration, and the appellant having failed to demonstrate reversible error, the judgment of the lower court appealed from herein is affirmed. See Stovall v. Denno, 388 U.S. 293, 87 S.Ct. 1967, 18 L.Ed.2d 1199, (1967), 16 A.L.R.2d 1322-1328s, vol. 2 Later Case Service, pg. 135, and Lewis v. State, 55 Fla. 54, 45 So. 998 (1908).

JOHNSON, C. J., and CARROLL, DONALD K., and RAWLS, JJ., concur.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Cited By

  • Courtney v. State, 358 So. 2d 1107 (Fla. 3d DCA 1978)
    …was not prejudicial to appellant; all it did was implicate Jacobs. Accordingly, we have concluded that the admission into evidence of the statement was entirely proper and appellant has failed to show any error in regard to it. See Johnson v. State, 225 So. 2d 440 (Fla. 1st DCA 1969); and Zide v. State, 225 So. 2d 349 (Fla. 1st DCA 1969). The record shows that appellant received a full and fair trial, and was ably assisted by competent counsel. By this appeal, no reversible prejudicial error has been made to…
  • Davis v. State, 354 So. 2d 1220 (Fla. 3d DCA 1978)
    …anistic or non-individualized manner as to be illegal. Further, we have considered appellant’s second point on appeal and, likewise, conclude that it is without merit. See, e. g., Simmons v. State, 236 So. 2d 147 (Fla.3d DCA 1970); Johnson v. State, 225 So. 2d 440 (Fla.1st DCA 1969); Zide v. State, 225 So. 2d 349 (Fla.1st DCA 1969), and Wright v. State, 182 So. 2d 264 (Fla.3d DCA 1966). Therefore, the final judgment and sentence appealed are affirmed. Affirmed.…
  • Rabin v. State, 356 So. 2d 39 (Fla. 3d DCA 1978)
    …erdict for grand larceny and attempted grand larceny. We have reviewed all of the points raised by appellant on appeal and find them to be without merit. Therefore, the judgment of conviction and sentence appealed are affirmed. See Johnson v. State, 225 So. 2d 440 (Fla. 1st DCA 1969); and Zide v. State, 225 So. 2d 349 (Fla. 1st DCA 1969). We note that the criminal charges against appellant arose under Section 811.-021, Florida Statutes (1973). Appellant, in one of his points on appeal, contends that the tria…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw