GENERAL MOTORS CORP. ET AL.

v.

DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE OF ALABAMA; AND REYNOLDS METALS CO. V. SIZEMORE, COMMISSIONER OF REVENUE OF ALABAMA

Citator

Cited By

• Nat'l Elevator Indus., Inc. v. Calhoon, 957 F.2d 1555 (10th Cir. 1992)
  …w rules that provide remedies for misconduct growing [*1559] out of the administration of the ERISA plan. Id. at 1356-57 (footnotes omitted); see also General Elec. Co. v. New York State Dep’t of Labor, 891 F. 2d 25, 29 (2d Cir.1989), cert. denied, 496 U.S. 912, 110 S.Ct. 2603, 110 L.Ed.2d 283 (1990). On the other hand, laws of general application — not specifically targeting ERISA plans — that involve traditional areas of state regulation and do not affect “relations among the principal ERISA entities — t…

  ← 1 / 2 →
• Cantu v. Collins, 967 F.2d 1006 (5th Cir. 1992)
  …r, even had Cantu's counsel proffered an expert witness to testify on this issue, the trial court would have had discretion whether to admit such testimony. Pierce v. State, 777 S.W. 2d 399, 414-16 (Tex.Crim.App.1989), cert, denied, Pierce v. Texas, 496 U.S. 912, 110 S.Ct. 2603, 110 L.Ed.2d 283 (1990). The Texas rule is also consistent with federal practice. In Moore, we held that the decision whether to admit expert testimony "is squarely within the discretion of the trial judge," adding that “there is no…
• Joint Apprenticeship & Training Council OF Local 363, Int'l Bhd. OF Teamsters, AFL-CIO v. NEW York State Dep't OF Labor, 984 F.2d 589 (2d Cir. 1993)
  …preempted by ERISA. See General Elec. Co. v. New York State Dep’t of Labor, 891 F. 2d 25, 29-30 (2d Cir.1989) (portions of the New York prevailing wage statute dealing with “supplements,” see N.Y.Lab.Law § 220, are preempted by ERISA), cert. denied, 496 U.S. 912, 110 S.Ct. 2603, 110 L.Ed.2d 283 (1990). JATC argues that the New York statutory scheme of apprenticeship regulation goes beyond the regulatory provisions authorized by the Fitzgerald Act and is an adjunct to, and an essential component of, the New…