ANDERSON

v.

COLLINS, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, INSTITUTIONAL DIVISION

Citator

Cited By

• In re Se. Banking Corp. v. First Tr. OF NEW York, 156 F.3d 1114 (11th Cir. 1998)
  …citness when enacting §510(a). See Midlantic Nat’l Bank v. New Jersey Dep’t of Environmental Protection, 474 U.S. 494, 500-501, 106 S.Ct. 755, 759, 88 L.Ed. 2d 859 (1986); In re Charter Co., 876 F. 2d 866, 870 n.6 (11th Cir.1989), cert. dismissed, 496 U.S. 944, 110 S.Ct. 3232, 110 L.Ed.2d 678 (1990). The Supreme Court has provided a guideline for interpreting this section by holding that amendments to existing bankruptcy laws are not to be read to revoke judicially established principles absent an expre…
• Off. & Prof'l Emps. Int'l Union v. Fed. Deposit Ins. Corp., 962 F.2d 63 (D.C. Cir. 1992)
  …Chapters 9 and 11). . Courts have taken different views of how literal compliance with Rule 2019 must be. Compare In re Chateaugay, 104 B.R. 626, 636 nn.12 & 13 (S.D.N.Y.1989), and In re Charter Co., 876 F. 2d 866 (11th Cir.1989), cert. dismissed, 496 U.S. 944, 110 S.Ct. 3232, 110 L.Ed.2d 678 (1990) (both reading rule flexibly, in light of purposes of Bankruptcy Code), with In re Vestra Indus., Inc., 82 B.R. 21, 22 (Bankr.D.S.C.1987) (rejecting union’s claim which failed to state names and addresses of em…