IN RE DISBARMENT OF WATKINS

Citator

Cited By

• Martin v. Occupational Safety & Health Review Comm'n, 499 U.S. 144 (U.S. 1991)
  …to resolve a conflict among the Circuits on the question whether a reviewing court should defer to the Secretary or to the Commission when these actors furnish reasonable but conflicting interpretations of an ambiguous regulation under the OSH Act.4 497 U. S. 1002 (1990). I — I l — l It is well established “that an agency s construction of its own regulations is entitled to substantial deference.” Lyng v. Payne, 476 U. S. 926, 989 (1986); accord, Udall v. Tallman, 380 U. S. 1, 16-17 (1965). In situations…
• Bus. Guides, Inc. v. Chromatic Commc'ns Enters., Inc., 498 U.S. 533 (U.S. 1991)
  …als vacated the order of sanctions and remanded to the District Court for reconsideration. Id., at 813-814. We granted certiorari to determine whether the Court of Appeals properly held Business Guides to an objective standard of reasonable inquiry. 497 U. S. 1002 (1990). Subsequently, the District Court issued an order reaffirming the dismissal and monetary sanctions. App. to Pet. for Cert. la-2a. II A “We give the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure their plain meaning.” Pavelic & LeFlore v. Marvel Entert…