PROCTOR

v.

JABE, WARDEN

Citator

Cited By

• United States v. Blackman, 66 F.3d 1572 (11th Cir. 1995)
  …e detained for an indefinite or extended period of time. An arrest can oe-cur in an instant. An officer can put his hand on a person and state that that person is “under arrest.” See United States v. Moreno, 897 F. 2d 26, 31 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 497 U.S. 1009, 110 S.Ct. 3250, 111 L.Ed.2d 760 (1990); cf. California v. Hodari D., supra, 499 U.S. at 626, 111 S.Ct. at 1550-51 (At common law, “[a]n arrest require[d] either physical force ... or, where that was absent, submission to the assertion of authority.…
• United States v. Prandy-Binett, 995 F.2d 1069 (D.C. Cir. 1993)
  …. 2d 121, 123, 128 (D.C.Cir.1984). No testimony was offered that Prandy-Binett appeared nervous, or exhibited the behavior of an individual currently using drugs. See, e.g., United States v. Moreno, 897 F. 2d 26, 28-29, 31 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 497 U.S. 1009, 110 S.Ct. 3250, 111 L.Ed.2d 760 (1990); United States v. Brown, 463 F. 2d 949, 950-51 (D.C.Cir.1972). Nor was there anything inherently unusual about the location of the package that could reasonably have added to Detective Centrella’s suspicions…
• United States v. Vaquero, 997 F.2d 78 (5th Cir. 1993)
  …tional right to testify on his own behalf; Taylor does not, however, have a protected right to testify falsely. United States v. Matos, 907 F. 2d 274, 276 (2nd Cir.1990); United States v. Beaulieu, 900 F. 2d 1537, 1539 (10th Cir.1990), cert. denied, 497 U.S. 1009, 110 S.Ct. 3252, 111 L.Ed.2d 762 (1990). Taylor’s constitutional rights were not infringed when the court increased his base offense level based on his perjury. United States v. Dunnigan, - U.S,-, 113 S.Ct. 1111, 122 L.Ed.2d 445 (1993); United State…

  ← 1 / 2 →