CAIN
v.
SOUTH CAROLINA; WEST V. TENNESSEE; EVANS V. THOMPSON, SUPERINTENDENT, MECKLENBURG CORRECTIONAL CENTER; MURTISHAW V. CALIFORNIA; RANSOM V. TEXAS; MOORE V. ZANT, SUPERINTENDENT, GEORGIA DIAGNOSTIC AND CLASSIFICATION CENTER; HOPKINSON V. SHILLINGER, WARDEN, ET AL.; BAREFIELD V. TEXAS; CALLINS V. TEXAS; PICKENS V. ARKANSAS; BARNES V. THOMPSON, WARDEN; BARROW V. ILLINOIS; HUFFMAN V. INDIANA
CAIN
SOUTH CAROLINA; WEST V. TENNESSEE; EVANS V. THOMPSON, SUPERINTENDENT, MECKLENBURG CORRECTIONAL CENTER; MURTISHAW V. CALIFORNIA; RANSOM V. TEXAS; MOORE V. ZANT, SUPERINTENDENT, GEORGIA DIAGNOSTIC AND CLASSIFICATION CENTER; HOPKINSON V. SHILLINGER, WARDEN, ET AL.; BAREFIELD V. TEXAS; CALLINS V. TEXAS; PICKENS V. ARKANSAS; BARNES V. THOMPSON, WARDEN; BARROW V. ILLINOIS; HUFFMAN V. INDIANA
497 U.S. 1010
Supreme Court of the United States (1990)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 10 cases
Dissent
Justice Brennan and Justice Marshall,
dissenting.
Adhering to our views that the death penalty is in all circumstances cruel and unusual punishment prohibited by the Eighth and Fourteenth Amendments, Gregg v. Georgia, 428 U. S. 153, 227, 231 (1976), we would grant certiorari and vacate the death sentences in these cases.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Ward v. State, 636 So. 2d 68 (Fla. 5th DCA 1994)…2); People v. Kalchik, 160 Mich.App. 40, 407 N.W. 2d 627 (1987); People v. Dezeki, 107 Mich.App. 78, 308 N.W. 2d 652 (1981); State v. Bryant, 287 Minn. 205, 177 N.W. 2d 800 (1970); United States v. White, 890 F. 2d 1012 (8th Cir.1989), cert. denied, 497 U.S. 1010, 110 S.Ct. 3254, 111 L.Ed.2d 763 (1990); Poole v. State, 596 So. 2d 632 (Ala.1992); LaFave, 1 Search & Seizure 2d § 2.4 (1987). . Compare Kirsch v. State, 10 Md.App. 565, 271 A. 2d 770 (1970); People v. Mercado, 68 N.Y.2d 874, 508 N.Y.S.2d 419, 501…
-
United States v. Chandler, 996 F.2d 1073 (11th Cir. 1993)…Virginia capital statute requires that the defendant receive a life sentence if the jury is unable to reach unanimity, the defendant is not entitled to a hung jury instruction. Evans v. Thompson, 881 F. 2d 117, 123-124 (4th Cir.1989), cert. denied, 497 U.S. 1010, 110 S.Ct. 3255, 111 L.Ed.2d 764 (1990). The Fourth Circuit also held that, although the South Carolina capital statute requires an instruction on the consequences of a hung jury, the lack of such an instruction has no affect on the sentencing deci…
-
Hill v. Jones, 81 F.3d 1015 (11th Cir. 1996)…(2) he was denied a reliable sentencing hearing because he was not permitted to cross-examine certain state witnesses before the judge who conducted the sentencing hearing in violation of Moore v. Zant, 885 F. 2d 1497 (11th Cir.1989), cert. denied, 497 U.S. 1010, 110 S.Ct. 3255, 111 L.Ed.2d 765 (1990) and Proffitt v. Wainwright, 685 F. 2d 1227 (11th Cir.1982), modified, 706 F. 2d 311 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 1002, 104 S.Ct. 508, 78 L.Ed.2d 697 (1983). We find these claims were procedurally defau…
Previewing 3 of 10 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Gregg v. Georgia, 428 U.S. 153 (U.S. 1976)