ENDSLEY, EXECUTRIX OF THE ESTATE OF ENDSLEY, ET AL.
v.
YOUNG
ENDSLEY, EXECUTRIX OF THE ESTATE OF ENDSLEY, ET AL.
YOUNG
497 U.S. 1024
Supreme Court of the United States (1990)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 3 cases
Opinion
Full opinion text not available for this case.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Rodriguez v. Pacificare OF Tex., Inc., 980 F.2d 1014 (5th Cir. 1993)…e for pendent party jurisdiction. Iron Workers Mid-South Pension Fund v. Terotechnology Corp., 891 F. 2d 548, 551 (5th Cir.) (no pendent jurisdiction over Louisiana property owner against whom plaintiffs asserted state law lien claim), cert. denied, 497 U.S. 1024, 110 S.Ct. 3272, 111 L.Ed.2d 782 (1990). Iron Workers was correctly operating under the principle announced in Finley that “pendent party jurisdiction does not exist, unless Congress has expressly spoken to allow it.” Sarmiento v. Texas Bd. of Vete…
-
Meyers v. Trinity Med. Ctr., 983 F.2d 905 (8th Cir. 1993)…rs Mid-South Pension Fund v. Terotechnology Corp., 891 F. 2d 548, 550-51 (5th Cir.) (ERISA did not supply a statutory grant of jurisdiction over a party; court lacked pendent party jurisdiction over state-law claims against that party) cert. denied, 497 U.S. 1024, 110 S.Ct. 3272, 111 L.Ed.2d 782 (1990); Staffer v. Bouchard Transportation Co., 878 F. 2d 638, 643 n. 5 (2d Cir.1989) (no pendent jurisdiction where there is no independent basis for federal jurisdiction over a party against whom only a state claim…
-
Trs. OF the Elec. Workers Health & Welf. Tr. v. Marjo Corp., 988 F.2d 865 (9th Cir. 1992)…1st Cir.1991), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 112 S.Ct. 1939, 118 L.Ed.2d 545 (1992); Sturgis v. Herman Miller, Inc., 943 F. 2d 1127, 1128-29 (9th Cir.1991); Iron Workers Pension Fund v. Terotechnology Corp., 891 F. 2d 548, 552-56 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 497 U.S. 1024, 110 S.Ct. 3272, 111 L.Ed.2d 782 (1990). Together, these cases support a much broader reading of the ERISA preemption provision than we recognized in D & L Camp and Majestic Housing. Finally, the Trustees argue — as they did in the district court…