OFFICE OF PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT
v.
RICHMOND; WAGNER V. UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT; POGUE V. WHITE STONE BAPTIST CHURCH ET AL.; STALHEIM V. ALBERT LEA MEDICAL SURGICAL CENTER, LTD., ET AL.; NORTON V. NICHOLSON ET AL.; WILK ET AL. V. JOINT COMMISSION ON ACCREDITATION OF HOSPITALS ET AL.; TAYLOR V. UNITED STATES; BITTAKER V. CALIFORNIA; SIDEBOTTOM V. MISSOURI; MCCARTER V. CALIFORNIA; ROBERTS V. GEORGIA; IN RE MCFADDEN; STULL V. UNITED STATES; CARGILL V. ZANT, WARDEN; MCFADDEN V. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE; ALLUSTIARTE ET AL. V. COOPER; FREEMAN V. ALABAMA; SALSMAN ET UX. V. UNITED STATES; EVERSON V. OTT ET AL.; DOWNS V. COLLINS, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, INSTITUTIONAL DIVISION; AMIRI V. JOHNSON, JUDGE, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA; AMIRI V. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ET AL.; ELMORE V. SOUTH CAROLINA; FLUKER V. TOWNSEND; SINDRAM V. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ET AL.; JACKSON ET UX. V. DIXON-BOOKMAN; MCCOLLUM V. INDIANA; MCCOLPIN V. CITY OF WICHITA ET AL.; WHISENHANT V. ALABAMA, IN RE BROOKS, WEXLER V. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR, IN RE SEITU, MARTIN V. FARNAN; MARTIN V. HUYETT; LUSK V. DUGGER, SECRETARY, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
OFFICE OF PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT
RICHMOND; WAGNER V. UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT; POGUE V. WHITE STONE BAPTIST CHURCH ET AL.; STALHEIM V. ALBERT LEA MEDICAL SURGICAL CENTER, LTD., ET AL.; NORTON V. NICHOLSON ET AL.; WILK ET AL. V. JOINT COMMISSION ON ACCREDITATION OF HOSPITALS ET AL.; TAYLOR V. UNITED STATES; BITTAKER V. CALIFORNIA; SIDEBOTTOM V. MISSOURI; MCCARTER V. CALIFORNIA; ROBERTS V. GEORGIA; IN RE MCFADDEN; STULL V. UNITED STATES; CARGILL V. ZANT, WARDEN; MCFADDEN V. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE; ALLUSTIARTE ET AL. V. COOPER; FREEMAN V. ALABAMA; SALSMAN ET UX. V. UNITED STATES; EVERSON V. OTT ET AL.; DOWNS V. COLLINS, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, INSTITUTIONAL DIVISION; AMIRI V. JOHNSON, JUDGE, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA; AMIRI V. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ET AL.; ELMORE V. SOUTH CAROLINA; FLUKER V. TOWNSEND; SINDRAM V. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ET AL.; JACKSON ET UX. V. DIXON-BOOKMAN; MCCOLLUM V. INDIANA; MCCOLPIN V. CITY OF WICHITA ET AL.; WHISENHANT V. ALABAMA, IN RE BROOKS, WEXLER V. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR, IN RE SEITU, MARTIN V. FARNAN; MARTIN V. HUYETT; LUSK V. DUGGER, SECRETARY, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
497 U.S. 1046
Supreme Court of the United States (1990)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 3 cases
Opinion
Full opinion text not available for this case.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Cargill v. Turpin, 120 F.3d 1366 (11th Cir. 1997)…shed order. Thereafter, the Georgia Supreme Court denied Cargill’s application for a certificate of probable cause, and the United States Supreme Court denied certiorari. Cargill v. Zant, 495 U.S. 963, 110 S.Ct. 2576, 109 L.Ed.2d 758, reh’g denied, 497 U.S. 1046, 111 S.Ct. 7, 111 L.Ed.2d 823 (1990). On January 31, 1991, Cargill filed the instant petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 in the United States District Court for the Middle District of Georgia, asserting thirty-eight cl…
-
Klaskala v. U.S. Dep't of Health & Human Servs., 889 F. Supp. 480 (S.D. Fla. 1995)
-
Brush v. Off. OF Pers. Mgmt., 982 F.2d 1554 (Fed. Cir. 1992)…record strongly suggests the elements of an estoppel that might be permitted through the crack left in the door by the language in Office of Personnel Management v. Richmond, 496 U.S. 414, 423, 110 S.Ct. 2465, 2470-71, 110 L.Ed.2d 387 reh'g denied, 497 U.S. 1046, 111 S.Ct. 5, 111 L.Ed.2d 821 (1990). . Section 2(3)(A) of the CSRSEA added paragraphs (3) to (5) to 5 U.S.C. § 8339(j) in 1984. Pub.L. No. 98-615, 98 Stat. 3195, 3196-97 (1984). . Section 831.601(e) was recodified at 831.-611(a) in 1985. 50-Fed.R…1 / 2