RUTAN ET AL.
v.
REPUBLICAN PARTY OF ILLINOIS ET AL.; FRECH ET AL. V. RUTAN ET AL.; CAIN V. SOUTH CAROLINA; JIMERSON V. ILLINOIS; WALTON V. ARIZONA; VICKERS V. ARIZONA; LEWIS, DIRECTOR, ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, ET AL. V. JEFFERS; METRO BROADCASTING, INC. V. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION ET AL.; COMMUNICATIONS SATELLITE CORP. V. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION ET AL.; SNYDER V. LEWIS, SECRETARY OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA; MEYER V. STATE BAR OF TEXAS; AND MEYER V. LOWRY, DISTRICT JUDGE, 261ST JUDICIAL DISTRICT, TRAVIS COUNTY, TEXAS, ET AL.; SALAZAR V. ILLINOIS; LIBBERTON V. ARIZONA; ODLE V. ILLINOIS; YOUNG V. ILLINOIS; PHILLIPS V. ILLINOIS; BRADLEY V. OHIO; FLORES V. ILLINOIS; MCKINNEY V. IDAHO; MILLER V. TENNESSEE; ALLEN V. ZANT, SUPERINTENDENT, GEORGIA DIAGNOSTIC AND CLASSIFICATION CENTER; SAWYER V. SMITH, INTERIM WARDEN; CARTWRIGHT V. OKLAHOMA; COLEMAN V. ILLINOIS; OWENS V. ILLINOIS; LANKFORD V. IDAHO; HOLMAN V. ILLINOIS; KOKORALEIS V. ILLINOIS; KNAPP V. MASCHNER ET AL.; FORD ET AL. V. RUTLEDGE ET AL.; CHRISTOPHERSON ET UX. V. SHAWANO COUNTY; KURTZ V. EDMISTON, SUPERINTENDENT, SOUTHERN STATE CORRECTIONAL FACILITY, ET AL.; BARROW V. ILLINOIS; ACCOLLA V. SULLIVAN, SUPERINTENDENT, SING SING CORRECTIONAL FACILITY, ET AL.; CURTIS V. AMERICAN BAKERIES CO. ET AL.; ISAACS V. GEORGIA; MUKHTAR V. UNITED STATES
RUTAN ET AL.
REPUBLICAN PARTY OF ILLINOIS ET AL.; FRECH ET AL. V. RUTAN ET AL.; CAIN V. SOUTH CAROLINA; JIMERSON V. ILLINOIS; WALTON V. ARIZONA; VICKERS V. ARIZONA; LEWIS, DIRECTOR, ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, ET AL. V. JEFFERS; METRO BROADCASTING, INC. V. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION ET AL.; COMMUNICATIONS SATELLITE CORP. V. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION ET AL.; SNYDER V. LEWIS, SECRETARY OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA; MEYER V. STATE BAR OF TEXAS; AND MEYER V. LOWRY, DISTRICT JUDGE, 261ST JUDICIAL DISTRICT, TRAVIS COUNTY, TEXAS, ET AL.; SALAZAR V. ILLINOIS; LIBBERTON V. ARIZONA; ODLE V. ILLINOIS; YOUNG V. ILLINOIS; PHILLIPS V. ILLINOIS; BRADLEY V. OHIO; FLORES V. ILLINOIS; MCKINNEY V. IDAHO; MILLER V. TENNESSEE; ALLEN V. ZANT, SUPERINTENDENT, GEORGIA DIAGNOSTIC AND CLASSIFICATION CENTER; SAWYER V. SMITH, INTERIM WARDEN; CARTWRIGHT V. OKLAHOMA; COLEMAN V. ILLINOIS; OWENS V. ILLINOIS; LANKFORD V. IDAHO; HOLMAN V. ILLINOIS; KOKORALEIS V. ILLINOIS; KNAPP V. MASCHNER ET AL.; FORD ET AL. V. RUTLEDGE ET AL.; CHRISTOPHERSON ET UX. V. SHAWANO COUNTY; KURTZ V. EDMISTON, SUPERINTENDENT, SOUTHERN STATE CORRECTIONAL FACILITY, ET AL.; BARROW V. ILLINOIS; ACCOLLA V. SULLIVAN, SUPERINTENDENT, SING SING CORRECTIONAL FACILITY, ET AL.; CURTIS V. AMERICAN BAKERIES CO. ET AL.; ISAACS V. GEORGIA; MUKHTAR V. UNITED STATES
497 U.S. 1050
Supreme Court of the United States (1990)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion
Full opinion text not available for this case.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Bonita H. Regan v. Boogertman, 984 F.2d 577 (2d Cir. 1993)…that party affiliation is an appropriate requirement for effective performance of the public office involved.” Id. More recently, the Supreme Court in Rutan v. Republican Party of Illinois, 497 U.S. 62, 110 S.Ct. 2729, 111 L.Ed.2d 52, reh’g denied, 497 U.S. 1050, 111 S.Ct. 13, 111 L.Ed.2d 828 (1990), held that party affiliation was not a permissible motivating factor in firing low-level employees. However, the Court affirmed the Elrod-Branti exception for certain high level positions, noting that “[a] gover…