LYMAN
v.
UNITED STATES

U.S. | 1990-10-01
No. 89-1634
498 U.S. 810 Supreme Court of the United States (1990) Negative Treatment
Cited by 1 case
Opinion

Full opinion text not available for this case.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Cited By

  • Genentech, Inc. v. ELI Lilly & Co., 998 F.2d 931 (Fed. Cir. 1993)
    …caption of 35 U.S.C. § 296 makes clear the intended limitation of that provision to infringement by the state. The University argues that Congress did no more than overrule Chew v. California, 893 F. 2d 331, 13 USPQ2d 1393 (Fed.Cir.), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 810, 111 S.Ct. 44, 112 L.Ed.2d 20 (1990) and Jacobs Wind Electric Co. v. Florida Department of Transportation, 919 F. 2d 726, 16 USPQ2d 1972 (Fed.Cir.1990), for in Chew and Jacobs Wind this court held that the Eleventh Amendment provides the states with…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw