SCHWARCZ

v.

SCHWARCZ

Citator

Cited By

• Ronny J. Goldsmith v. Mayor & City Council OF Baltimore, 987 F.2d 1064 (4th Cir. 1993)
  …(Goldsmith I). . Though the nominal defendants are the Mayor and City Council, the real party in interest actually is the City of Baltimore itself. See Baker v. Mayor and City Council of Baltimore, 894 F. 2d 679, 680 n. 1 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 815, 111 S.Ct. 56, 112 L.Ed.2d 31 (1990). . During the relevant time period defendants Cunningham and Lauer were members of the Financial Review staff, while defendant Loleas was Executive Assistant to the City Council President. . We also affirmed th…

  ← 1 / 2 →
• Clifton v. Attorney Gen. OF the State OF Cal., 997 F.2d 660 (9th Cir. 1993)
  …re Pacific Far East Lines, Inc., 889 F. 2d 242, 250 (9th Cir.1989). . This court refused to reach the question whether Rule 60(b) permits a court to vacate a prior judgment sua sponte in In re Corey, 892 F. 2d 829, 835 (9th Cir.1989), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 815, 111 S.Ct. 56, 112 L.Ed.2d 31 (1990). In In re Lenox, 902 F. 2d 737, 740 (9th Cir.1990), this court indicated that Rule 60(b) "does not prohibit a bankruptcy judge from reviewing, sua sponte, a previous order.... And although FRCP 60(b) refers to re…