FRANKLIN PIERCE LAW CENTER
v.
GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY
FRANKLIN PIERCE LAW CENTER
GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY
498 U.S. 816
Supreme Court of the United States (1990)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion
Full opinion text not available for this case.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
United States v. March, 999 F.2d 456 (10th Cir. 1993)…ng would it take if I want a lawyer, and would I have to stay in jail while I wait for a lawyer?”); United States v. Scarpa, 897 F. 2d 63, 66 (2d Cir.) (“I don’t have a lawyer, I’m going to get a lawyer, I don’t know the guy’s name.”), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 816, 111 S.Ct. 57, 112 L.Ed.2d 32 (1990). In contrast, in United States v. Giles, 967 F. 2d 382, 385-86 (10th Cir.1992), we held that when the defendant asked when he would be given an opportunity to talk to an attorney, he was invoking his right to co…
-
United States v. Miller, 997 F.2d 1010 (2d Cir. 1993)…tain in its material terms or intent of parties can be ascertained using objective standards); Cobble Hill Nursing Home, Inc. v. Henry & Warren Corp., 74 N.Y.2d 475, 482-83, 548 N.E. 2d 203, 205-06, 548 N.Y.S.2d 920, 923 (1989) (same), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 816, 111 S.Ct. 58, 112 L.Ed.2d 33 (1990); see also Restatement (Second) of Contracts § 33 (1981) (terms of a contract must be reasonably certain). We are therefore led back to the government’s “economic benefit or constructive trust theory.” In their c…