INDEPENDENCE BLUE CROSS ET AL.

v.

U. S. HEALTHCARE, INC., ET AL.

Citator

Cited By

• Perez v. State, 673 So. 2d 160 (Fla. 4th DCA 1996)
  …lled.” Moran v. Burbine, 475 U.S. 412, 433 n. 4, 106 S.Ct. 1135, 1147 n. 4, 89 L.Ed.2d 410, 428 n. 4 (1986). Similarly, the individual must assert the right to counsel. Id.; see also United States v. Scarpa, 897 F. 2d 63, 69 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 816, 111 S.Ct. 57, 112 L.Ed.2d 32 (1990); Commonwealth v. Lowery, 276 Pa.Super. 569, 419 A. 2d 604, 608 (1980). We are unable to find any case where a third party has been allowed to invoke Miranda rights on behalf of a competent adult. Appellant furth…
• Tire Kingdom, Inc. v. Morgan Tire & Auto, Inc., 915 F. Supp. 360 (S.D. Fla. 1996)
• Windsor Sec., Inc. v. Hartford Life Ins. Co., 986 F.2d 655 (3d Cir. 1993)
  …§ 766 (Tent. Draft No. 23, 1977). As we have previously noted, "the `final restatement is the same in substance.'" Nathanson, 926 F. 2d at 1388 n. 14 (quoting United States Healthcare v. Blue Cross, 898 F. 2d 914, 925 n. 12 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 816, 111 S.Ct. 58, 112 L.Ed.2d 33 (1990)). . We are aware that some district courts have implicitly assumed that Pennsylvania would adopt (or has adopted) § 766A. See Batoff v. State Farm Ins. Co., 1992 WL 59142, at *5, 1992 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3501, at *…