HOLCOMB

v.

BARDILL

Citator

Cited By

• Phillips v. Ostrer, 481 So. 2d 1241 (Fla. 3d DCA 1985)
  …. 2d 39 (Fla. 3d DCA 1980); Sunrise Point, Inc. v. Reliance Realty, Inc., 371 So. 2d 674 (Fla. 3d DCA 1979). Courts should construe verdicts to carry out the jury’s intentions. Advance Co. v. Albert, 216 So. 2d 474 (Fla. 3d DCA 1968), cert. denied, 225 So. 2d 526 (Fla.1969). Although a jury may award a greater sum than the trial court deems appropriate, the court may not interfere unless the sum is so large that it indicates the jury must have been under the influence of passion, prejudice, or gross mistake.…
• Fla. Welding & Erection Serv., Inc. v. Am. Mut. Ins. Co. OF Boston, 285 So. 2d 386 (Fla. 1973)
  …§ 627.072, F.S.A., is a reenactment, with some modifications, of Fla.Stat. § 627.081, F.S.A., eff. Oct. 1, 1967. . Odham v. Foremost Dairies, Inc., 128 So. 2d 586 (Fla.1961) ; City of Coral Gables v. Sakolsky, 215 So. 2d 829 (Fla.App.), cert, den., 225 So. 2d 526 (Fla.1969).…
• Skidmore v. The Volpe Constr. Co., Inc., 511 So. 2d 642 (Fla. 3d DCA 1987)
  …med correct and should be construed to give effect to the jury’s intent. Phillips v. Ostrer, 481 So. 2d 1241, 1246 (Fla. 3d DCA 1985), review denied, 492 So. 2d 1334 (Fla.1986); Advance Co. v. Albert, 216 So. 2d 474 (Fla. 3d DCA 1968), cert. denied, 225 So. 2d 526 (Fla.1969); Dicosola v. Heitel, 138 So. 2d 804 (Fla. 2d DCA 1962). In this case, the jury intended to return a verdict in favor of Volpe Construction Company [Volpe] on its contract claim and in favor of U.S. Development Corporation [U.S. Developmen…

Authorities Cited

• Holcomb v. Bardill, 214 So. 2d 522 (Fla. 4th DCA 1968)