ADAIR

v.

UNITED STATES; AND TOOMER V. UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By

• United States v. Dale, 991 F.2d 819 (D.C. Cir. 1993)
  …statement is necessary to the finding of probable cause, the Fourth Amendment requires that a hearing be held at the defendant’s request. Id. at 155-56, 98 S.Ct. at 2676; see United States v. Sobamowo, 892 F. 2d 90, 94 (D.C.Cir.1989), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 825, 111 S.Ct. 78, 112 L.Ed.2d 51 (1990). The defendants contend that they made such a showing before the district court by proffering evidence that: allegations in the warrant that ADM illegally substituted products in executing contracts with the Army…
• United States v. Wicks, 995 F.2d 964 (10th Cir. 1993)
  …where contraband may be kept. ); United States v. Hoyos, 892 F. 2d 1387, 1392 (9th Cir.1989) (“[t]he experience and expertise of the officers involved in the investigation and arrest may be considered in determining probable cause.”), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 825, 111 S.Ct. 80, 112 L.Ed.2d 52 (1990). We affirm the district court’s conclusion that probable cause supported the issuance of the search warrant. Wicks next argues that the warrant fails to meet the second part of the Fourth Amendment’s requirement…