AYERS ET AL.

v.

UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By

• United States v. Tracy, 989 F.2d 1279 (1st Cir. 1993)
  …nformation” was available, the court was warranted under note 11 in using the former in preference to the Typical Weight Per Unit Table. See U.S.S.G. § 2D1.1, application note 11; United States v. Bishop, 894 F. 2d 981, 987 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 836, 111 S.Ct. 106, 112 L.Ed.2d 77 (1990). The table produces conservative estimates that, among other things, do not account for the weight of the “mixture or substance” containing the LSD. As the weight of LSD blotter paper is considered a “mixture or…

  ← 1 / 2 →
• United States v. Schenk, 983 F.2d 876 (8th Cir. 1993)
  …o determine the base offense level. Chapman v. United States, — U.S. -, -, 111 S.Ct. 1919, 1922, 114 L.Ed.2d 524 (1991); United States v. Martz, 964 F. 2d 787, 790 (8th Cir.1992); United States v. Bishop, 894 F. 2d 981, 985 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 836, 111 S.Ct. 106, 112 L.Ed.2d 77 (1990). Schenk’s argument is meritless. VI. For the reasons stated above, we affirm the judgment of the district court. . The Honorable Edward L. Filippine, Chief Judge, United States District Court for the Eastern…