VIDEO NEWS, INC.

v.

TEXAS

Citator

Cited By (18 total)

• Smith v. Robbins, 528 U.S. 259 (U.S. 2000)
  …Cross v. United States, 893 F. 2d 1287, 1290-1291, 1292 (CA11) (rejecting challenge to appellate counsel’s failure to raise claim of violation of Faretta v. California, 422 U. S. 806 (1975), by determining that there was no prejudice), cert. denied, 498 U. S. 849 (1990). Since Robbins was convicted in state court, we have no occasion to consider whether a per se prejudice approach, in lieu of Strickland’s actual-prejudice requirement, might be appropriate in the context of challenges to federal convictions…
• Dir., Off. of Workers' Comp. Programs, Dep't of Labor v. Greenwich Collieries, 512 U.S. 267 (U.S. 1994)
  …rm is used in the APA means the burden of going forward, not the burden of persuasion”); Hazardous Waste Treatment Council v. EPA, 886 F. 2d 355, 366 (CADC 1989) (per curiam) (“initial burden of going forward with a prima facie case”), cert. denied, 498 U. S. 849 (1990); Merritt v. United States, 960 F. 2d 15, 18 (CA2 1992) (“refers only to the burden of going forward with evidence, not the burden of persuasion”); Bosma v. United States Dept. of Agriculture, 754 F. 2d 804, 810 (CA9 1984) (“burden of going fo…
• Ocie Mills v. United States, 36 F.3d 1052 (11th Cir. 1994)
  …im on direct appeal, it will not be considered in a motion for § 2255 relief unless he can establish cause for the default and actual prejudice resulting from the alleged error. Cross v. United States, 893 F. 2d 1287, 1289 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 849, 111 S.Ct. 138, 112 L.Ed.2d 105 (1990). Alternatively, under the fundamental miscarriage of justice exception, “in an extraordinary case, where a constitutional violation has probably resulted in the conviction of one who is actually innocent, a f…