GRIFFIN
v.
FULCOMER, SUPERINTENDENT, STATE CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION, HUNTINGDON, PENNSYLVANIA, ET AL.
GRIFFIN
FULCOMER, SUPERINTENDENT, STATE CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION, HUNTINGDON, PENNSYLVANIA, ET AL.
498 U.S. 861
Supreme Court of the United States (1990)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion
Full opinion text not available for this case.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Sinclair v. Henman, 986 F.2d 407 (10th Cir. 1993)…5). If the execution was invalid because the Marshal’s Service did not follow the instructions of the United States Parole Commission, a parole revocation hearing was not required. McConnell v. Martin, 896 F. 2d 441, 446 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 861, 111 S.Ct. 167, 112 L.Ed.2d 131 (1990). The outcome of this case is controlled by McConnell. In McConnell, the Marshal’s Service executed a parole violator warrant on an individual who was in federal custody for possession of narcotics and firear…