MARSHALL

v.

OHIO

Citator

Cited By

• United States v. Barnette, 10 F.3d 1553 (11th Cir. 1994)
  …etermine ... the size of the civil sanction the Government may receive without crossing the line between remedy and punishment.” 490 U.S. at 449-50, 109 S.Ct. at 1902; see also United States v. Mayers, 897 F. 2d 1126, 1127 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 865, 111 S.Ct. 178, 112 L.Ed.2d 142 (1990) (holding that the Double Jeopardy Clause may be triggered when a “civil penalty ... rose to the level of criminal punishment because of the lack of rational relation to the Government’s loss”). Nevertheless, t…
• United States v. Int'l Bhd. OF Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen & Helpers of Am., AFL-CIO, 986 F.2d 15 (2d Cir. 1993)
  …“if an attorney has apparent authority to settle a case, and the opposing counsel has no reason to doubt that authority, the settlement will be upheld.” Fennell, 865 F. 2d at 502; Janneh v. GAF Corp., 887 F. 2d 432, 436 (2d Cir.1989), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 865, 111 [*20] S.Ct. 177, 112 L.Ed.2d 141 (1990); see also Restatement of the Law Governing Lawyers ch. 2, §§ 38, 39 (Tent.Draft No. 5, 1992). In a case arising under federal law, the scope of an agent’s authority is determined according to federal pre…
• Desktop Direct, Inc. v. Digit. Equip. Corp., 993 F.2d 755 (10th Cir. 1993)
  …s, and agree with the position of Judge Cox, dissenting in Forbus v. Sears, Roebuck & Co., 958 F. 2d 1036 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 113 S.Ct. 412, 121 L.Ed.2d 336 (1992). In Janneh v. GAF Corp., 887 F. 2d 432 (2d Cir.1989), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 865, 111 S.Ct. 177, 112 L.Ed.2d 141 (1990), the Second Circuit held that a district court order refusing to enforce a settlement agreement is “important” because the order involves the deprivation of significant rights, namely, GAF’s bargained-for righ…

  ← 1 / 2 →