ENGEL
v.
SISSEL ET AL.
ENGEL
SISSEL ET AL.
498 U.S. 868
Supreme Court of the United States (1990)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion
Full opinion text not available for this case.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Eluid Trevino-Casares v. U.S. Parole Comm'n, 992 F.2d 1068 (10th Cir. 1993)…tatutorily authorized maximum sentence shall be the guideline sentence.”); see Thorpe v. United States Parole Comm’n, 902 F. 2d 291, 292 (5th Cir.) (treating foreign sentence as statutorily authorized maximum under § 5Gl.l(a)), cert. [*1071] denied, 498 U.S. 868, 111 S.Ct. 185, 112 L.Ed.2d 148 (1990). Furthermore, because Mr. Trevino-Casares suffered “serious and severe physical abuse while in foreign custody resulting in permanent physical damage,” the Commission imposed only 71 months imprisonment, see U…1 / 2
-
Lara v. U.S. Parole Comm'n, 990 F.2d 839 (5th Cir. 1993)…t on that offender.” See Hansen v. United States Parole Comm’n, 904 F. 2d 306, 310 (5th Cir.1990), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 1052, 111 S.Ct. 765, 112 L.Ed.2d 784 (1991); Thorpe v. United States Parole Comm’n, 902 F. 2d 291, 292 (5th Cir.), cert denied, 498 U.S. 868, 111 S.Ct. 185, 112 L.Ed.2d 148 (1990) (both applying § 4106A). Recently, this court held that the combined periods of imprisonment and supervised release cannot be less than the foreign-court imposed sentence. Cannon v. United States Dept. of Justi…