L. A. SLOAN

v.

FRANCES L. SLOAN

Citator

Cited By

• Salem Dandashi and Mansham Dandashi v. Fine, 397 So. 2d 442 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981)
  …a. 4th DCA 1971) (hypothetical question calling for opinion as to speed of vehicle at time of accident based on skid mark without essential fact of weight of vehicle); Delta Rent-A-Car, Inc. v. Rihl, 218 So. 2d 469 (Fla. 4th DCA 1969), cert. denied, 225 So. 2d 535 (Fla.1969) (hypothetical calling for speed of vehicle objectionable in the absence of measurements and other necessary factors); Young v. Pyle, 145 So. 2d 503 (Fla. 1st DCA 1962) (propounding of hypothetical question which includes facts not support…
• Regal Kitchens, Inc. v. Fla. Dep't OF Revenue, 641 So. 2d 158 (Fla. 1st DCA 1994)
  …direct or indirect.” This definition is broad enough to encompass many different forms of rental arrangements, including the transaction in this case. See, e.g., Kirk v. Western Contracting Corp., 216 [*163] So. 2d 503 (Fla. 1st DCA), cert. denied, 225 So. 2d 535 (Fla.1969). The stockholders of Regal Kitchens would not have titled the property in the name of a partnership and leased it back unless there was some benefit inherent in that arrangement. Nothing in subsection 212.02(2) Florida Statutes (1989), su…
• Andrews v. TEW, 512 So. 2d 276 (Fla. 2d DCA 1987)
  …sion of the expert’s testimony was error, the error was harmless. Where an expert’s testimony is merely cumulative of other testimony as to speed, reversal is not required. Delta Rent-A-Car, Inc. v. Rihl, 218 So. 2d 469 (Fla. 4th DCA), cert. denied, 225 So. 2d 535 (Fla.1969). In this case, the expert’s opinion corroborated Andrews’ testimony. Because there was no evidence to the contrary, the expert’s testimony was cumula [*280] tive and therefore its admission was not reversible error. Based on the foregoin…

Authorities Cited

• Elson v. Silberman, 221 So. 2d 248 (Fla. 3d DCA 1969)