OLIVER ET UX.

v.

MERCHANTS & FARMERS BANK, MACON; MISSISSIPPI, FOREMAN V. AETNA CASUALTY & SURETY CO.; SHIPLEY ET UX. V. FIRST FEDERAL SAVINGS & LOAN ASSOCIATION OF DELAWARE ET AL.; ESPINUEVA V. GARRETT, SECRETARY OF THE NAVY; ELZY V. SMITH, WARDEN, ET AL.; LITTLEJOHN V. SOUTH CAROLINA

Citator

Cited By

• Am. Policyholders Ins. Co. v. Nyacol Prods., Inc., 989 F.2d 1256 (1st Cir. 1993)
  …ional matters for the first time in a petition for rehearing. See Kale v. Combined Ins. Co., 924 F. 2d 1161, 1169 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 112 S.Ct. 69, 116 L.Ed.2d 44 (1991); Anderson v. Beatrice Foods Co., 900 F. 2d 388, 397 (1st Cir.), 498 U.S. 891, 111 S.Ct. 233, 112 L.Ed.2d 193 (1990). That rule has particular pertinence here because, following oral argument, the panel invited supplemental briefing on the specific question of federal court removal jurisdiction in light of International Pri…
• Gerardo Mariani & Georgina Loureiro v. Doctors Assocs., Inc., 983 F.2d 5 (1st Cir. 1993)
  …to the circumstances surrounding an alleged violation. The trial judge, steeped in the facts and sensitive to the interplay amongst the protagonists, is ideally equipped to review those ramifications and render an informed judgment.”), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 891, 111 S.Ct. 233, 112 L.Ed.2d 193 (1990). We therefore review all aspects of the district court’s Rule 11 determination under an abuse of discretion standard. Cooter & Gell, 496 U.S. at 400-01, 110 S.Ct. at 2458; Navarro-Ayala v. Nunez, 968 F. 2d 1421…