DODSON

v.

SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, HARTFORD-NEW BRITAIN JUDICIAL DISTRICT

Citator

Cited By

• United States v. O'Bryant, 998 F.2d 21 (1st Cir. 1993)
  …. Pacheco, 912 F. 2d 297, 305 (9th Cir.1990); United States v. Schmick, 904 F. 2d 936, 940 (5th Cir.1990), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 1067, 111 S.Ct. 782, 112 L.Ed.2d 845 (1991); United States v. Italiano, 894 F. 2d 1280, 1282 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 896, 111 S.Ct. 246, 112 L.Ed.2d 205 (1990); United States v. Jones, 816 F. 2d 1483, 1487 (10th Cir.1987); United States v. Gengo, 808 F. 2d 1, 3 (2d Cir.1986); United States v. Friedman, 649 F. 2d 199, 203-04 (3d Cir. [*24] 1981); but see United States…
• Wilson v. United States Dep't OF Agric., 991 F.2d 1211 (5th Cir. 1993)
  …notice of potential claims. See 7 C.F.R. § 401.8(d)8 (1988). We generally defer to an agency’s interpretation of its own regulations and procedural rules. See Citizens for Fair Util. Regulation v. N.R.C., 898 F. 2d 51, 54 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 896, 111 S.Ct. 246, 112 L.Ed.2d 205 (1990). We cannot do so in this matter, however, as the FCIC has put forth two positions that are at loggerheads with each other. First, the FCIC contends that the regulations are unambiguous, and that notice must be…